"Daoist Critique of Dialectics"

道可道,非常道。名可名,非常名。(道德经 - Daodejing)
"The path that can be a path is not the eternal path. The name that can be named is not the eternal name."
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 6

class="first">"Daoist Critique of Dialectics"

Post by JayStor » Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:41 am

I found a recent article online called "A Daoist Critique of Dialectics and Why It Matters" by Joseph Pratt & Yingnan Zhao of Peking University Law School.
From the Abstract:
Hegel’s theory of dialectics is one of the most influential modern attempts at a complete account of reality. Kant and other scholars had resurrected dialectics during the Industrial Revolution as the contradictory either/or thinking accorded with their sense of a fragmented and conflicted world. Hegel then developed a dynamic version of dialectics that he offered as a complete theory. Marx, following scientific trends, applied that dynamic approach to a material explanation of reality. These two dialectic theories, however, beginning with their assumption of contradiction as fundamental, also rested on controversial first principles and thus were stuck in the same kind of paradox that Hegel had originally lamented.
The Eastern wisdom tradition of Daoism, in contrast to [Western] dialectics, encompasses not just contradiction in a disharmonious dialectic with confirmation, but also complementarity in a harmonious relationship with opposition. This complementarity allows for a seamless path to a transcendent whole and eventually to an ultimate reality, which in Daoism is called “the Dao” [道]. Though Daoism’s particular metaphysical details have been overlooked even in China for much of the past two millennia, they have been practiced in Traditional Chinese Medicine [TCM] and are otherwise central to much of Chinese culture. Daoism is the realization of the dialectical quest for a complete account of reality, and as such warrants contemporary scholars’ attention.
The full (long) paper is posted here:

Post Reply